James Gilford – Founder of THM

James, the Founder of THM, is an ex-marketer turned recruiter with over a decade of experience in marketing and digital recruitment. Starting his career in marketing at Nectar Card, he became a top consultant at EMR before establishing the financial services practice at tml Partners. In 2020, James launched THM, working with businesses globally—from startups to corporates—to build exceptional marketing and digital teams.

Follow James on LinkedIn → 

Why Job Boards Stop Working at Senior Level — And What Works Instead

(Director, Head of Function, VP, C-Suite)

This page is written for experienced professionals who have reached senior or leadership level — and are finding that job boards, applications, and “doing more of the same” no longer produce meaningful results.

If you have a strong track record, credible leadership experience, and a history of impact — yet are seeing little response from applications — the problem is unlikely to be your background.

More often, the issue is that senior hiring does not operate through the same mechanisms as junior or mid-level recruitment. Job boards are optimised for a different type of hiring problem. How Senior Leadership Roles Are Actually Secured

Why Job Boards Used to Work

Job boards were built to solve a specific challenge: matching defined roles with comparable candidates at scale.

They work well when:

  • responsibilities are clearly specified
  • skills are easily comparable
  • volume improves outcomes
  • risk is relatively low

For much of a career, this makes sense. Early and mid-career hiring is largely about capability matching. Titles, years of experience, and technical skills carry meaningful signal.

In those contexts, job boards can be efficient and effective.

Why Job Boards Stop Working at Senior Level

Senior leadership hiring is a fundamentally different problem.

At leadership level:

  • most CVs look strong on paper
  • achievements are contextual, not directly comparable
  • impact is qualitative rather than keyword-based
  • judgment, trust, and fit outweigh credentials

Applicant Tracking Systems flatten complex careers into surface-level signals: titles, employers, years, keywords. This removes the very information decision-makers care most about at senior level.

The result is not rejection because a candidate is weak — but invisibility because the channel cannot recognise why they are strong.

The Hidden Reality of Senior Hiring

Most senior leadership roles are filled long before they ever appear on a job board — if they appear at all.

Leadership hiring is rarely a clean vacancy-replacement exercise. It is usually triggered by:

  • a strategic shift or new growth phase
  • a visible leadership gap
  • pressure from the board or investors
  • a failed internal promotion
  • a quiet exit or restructure

In these situations, organisations prioritise certainty over speed. Rather than broadcasting a role publicly, they first explore trusted options:

  • internal succession or interim solutions
  • referrals from board members, founders, or investors
  • direct approaches to known leaders
  • private recruiter shortlists

By the time a senior role is advertised publicly, organisations often already have a preferred profile — and sometimes informal front-runners.

Why Applying “Harder” Makes Things Worse

Many senior candidates respond to silence by increasing volume: more applications, broader searches, more platforms.

Unfortunately, this often reduces outcomes rather than improving them.

  • it places senior leaders into high-volume funnels designed for junior hiring
  • it strips context and narrative from experience
  • it increases competition while reducing differentiation

At senior level, effort without positioning rarely converts.

What Actually Works Instead

Successful senior searches focus on positioning, access, and timing — not volume.

  • clear leadership positioning and narrative
  • targeted market mapping
  • proactive, credible outreach
  • direct exposure to decision-makers
  • consistency over time

Positioning before opportunity

Senior hiring is narrative-led. Decision-makers are not asking “Can this person do the job?” — they are asking:

  • what problem does this person solve for us?
  • have they faced situations like ours?
  • can we trust their judgment?

Access before vacancies

Many senior roles are shaped around individuals. Being visible early — before a role is defined — changes outcomes dramatically.

Timing over speed

Senior moves take time. Momentum compounds through sustained, structured effort rather than reactive bursts.

How Senior Leaders Typically Work With Us

Senior leaders who work with us are not outsourcing responsibility — they are adding structure and leverage to an already strong profile.

  • clarifying leadership positioning and narrative
  • identifying the right organisations before roles exist
  • mapping relevant decision-makers
  • running discreet, credible outreach
  • maintaining momentum alongside existing commitments

If This Reflects Your Situation

This approach is not right for everyone. It works best for experienced leaders who recognise that senior hiring requires a different strategy. Reverse recruiters work on behalf of senior candidates, proactively representing them to relevant organisations before roles are formally advertised.

Ready to approach this differently?

A short confidential conversation can help clarify whether this approach fits your goals, timing, and market.